Aug 06, 2022
Sexpert reveals how long sex should really last – and the answer may shock you
This news has been received from: the-sun.com
All trademarks, copyrights, videos, photos and logos are owned by respective news sources. News stories, videos and live streams are from trusted sources.
Nadia Bokody, from Australia, revealed the question had come up with a previous partner, after she was happy to stop after 20 minutes, whereas he wanted to go for hours.3A sexpert has explored the topic of how long sex should last for - and the result may surprise youCredit: Getty Images - Getty 3Nadia Bokody revealed the question had come up with a previous partnerCredit: Instagram/Nadia Bokody
Taking to News.com.au, Nadia said: “An hour-and-a-half in, I terminated our sex-a-thon.
“An all-night bang-fest may have been vaguely alluring in my 20s, but post-30, the only prolonged physical activity my body’s up for is lifting Doritos to my mouth while watching Marie Kondo in my Snuggie.”
Nadia did some research and found a 1948 study by sex researcher Alfred Kinsey who concluded three quarters of men finish after two minutes.
However, she found a 2008 paper published in The Journal Of Sexual Medicine that said the average sexual encounter lasts between three and seven minutes, and another study that found a range from just 33 seconds to almost an hour.Read more Fabulous storiesMOAN N GROAN My neighbour reported me for having loud sex - I spent £3k to fix the problemCROSSED THE LINE My friend babysat my kids & did the unthinkable - I can't trust her again
She added: “Interestingly, while research overwhelmingly indicates women require more time than men to orgasm during partnered sex, it’s typically men, not women, who report wanting nookie to last longer.
“This may, in part at least, be due to the influence of porn.
“Research suggests at least a quarter of young people aged 18 to 24 rely on it as a form of sex education.
“And given its emphasis on enduring erections and marathon sex sessions, it’s plausible a man might feel he’s come up short if he hasn’t surpassed the 10-minute mark.”Most read in LifestyleTRUE BEAUTY I’m a fashion pro - I did a Victoria’s Secret haul, the pieces were stunningSECRET STRUGGLE I worked for Victoria’s Secret for YEARS and the dress codes are wildCHECK YOURSELF I worked at Walmart – what a ‘call for help’ message at self-checkout meansBREAST IDEA? My 34K boobs are so big they knock things over & cost me a fortune in bras
Nadia added: “In truth, there’s no such thing as normal when it comes to sex.
“For some of us, it lasts all night. But for many also, it’s wrapped up in time to get into our Snuggies, watch some Marie Kondo, and get the hell to sleep.”
FABULOUS BINGO: Get a £20 bonus & 30 free spins when you spend £10 today
A viral TikTok video, which racked up four million hits, showed a woman asking “How long is sex supposed to last?”
In the clip, the woman says: “I was talking to these young girls here, and they were like, ‘If he ain’t going for an hour..’ A HOUR?!
“Who is having sex for that long? Just straight intercourse? For an hour? No, ma’am. Fifteen, 20 minutes, tops. After that, get the f**k off of me, Sir.”
People were quick to chime in with their views on preferred sex times, with one saying: “After 15 minutes I’m making grocery lists.”
However, one said: “I’m sad for all of you. Been with my man 20 years and we go hours. Like, two or three hours, and have a blast.”
So what do you think?3Nadia said there is no such thing as normal when it comes to sexCredit: nadiabokody / Instagram
Previously, Nadia revealed the common lie told in the bedroom which is ‘hurting women’.
Meanwhile, a sexpert shared the four mistakes we’re all making in the bedroom and why you need to focus on ‘afterplay'.Sexpert insists size ISN’T everything and argues well-endowed men are often worse in bed
News Source: the-sun.com
Why creating a horror movie haven on Netflix may be a smart move for the streaming giant
In this article
There's a big money question haunting Netflix.
In recent years, the streamer has spent big on flashy, blockbuster-style action movies like "The Gray Man" and "Red Notice," which ran the company $200 million each. The films are the first steps in bids to spark event-level franchises. But they're costly, and it's unclear how impactful they have been for Netflix's bottom line.
Meanwhile, the platform's smash hit "Stranger Things," a supernatural thriller with horror undertones, has become a clear cultural touchstone. The series, which just released its fourth season, has inspired Halloween costumes and videogame versions of the monster-filled alternative universe.
While the show has a similar budget to these high-octane action flicks — around $30 million per episode, or more than $200 million per season — its success has led some in the industry to question whether high-budget features are worth Netflix's investment.
Netflix's streaming rivals have begun to shift their own content strategies in order to spend less on direct-to-streaming film content. Warner Bros. Discovery CEO David Zaslav said Thursday his company has been unable to find an "economic value" in producing big-budget films for its streaming services.
"We've seen, luckily, by having access now to all the data, how direct-to-streaming movies perform," Zaslav said during the company's second-quarter earnings call. "And our conclusion is that expensive direct-to-streaming movies ... is no comparison to what happens when you launch a film in the motion picture, in the theaters."
Netflix doesn't often release films in theaters, unless it's seeking Academy Award eligibility, so it budgets for movies knowing that its only option for recouping spend is through subscription growth.
That's why analysts have pointed to the horror genre as a potential avenue for Netflix.
The horror genre, in particular, typically comes with lower production costs, making these kinds of films ideal for the box office as they often rake in significantly more in ticket sales than they cost to make.
Blumhouse and Universal's "Get Out" cost just $4.5 million to produce and went on to generate more than $250 million at the global box office.
And while "The Gray Man" is set to be developed into a franchise, Peter Csathy, founder and chairman of advisory firm Creative Media, suggested Netflix is overlooking franchise opportunities in horror that could save the company hundreds of millions per film.
"Scream," "Insidious," "Halloween" and other horror film series have won over fans of the genre, as low-budget alternatives to more expensive franchise endeavors like Fast and Furious, Star Wars, Marvel or Lord of the Rings.
"The production costs are a sliver, a fraction, a small fraction of what it is for these huge bets that are made," he said. "And why not go for an inexpensive sure thing that hits your targeted demo? Why not put your money there, rather than doing these big prestige plays?"
Plus, Csathy added, the target audience for the horror genre also happens to be young — the demographic advertisers and streamers want to tap into.
Netflix has seen success from past horror releases including its "Fear Street" trilogy and has a number of Netflix Original releases in the genre including "No One Gets Out Alive" and "There's Someone Inside Your House."
Michael Pachter, an analyst at Wedbush, suggested Netflix could get more for its money by sticking with a lineup of horror and rom-com projects, both of which tend to be relatively low-budget. With more modest budgets, missteps aren't as big of a deal.
"The cool thing about low budget is you can make mistakes," he said. "Big budget, you just can't make any. If you screw up, you're screwed. So which is riskier, a $150 million movie or three $50 million movies?"Missing metrics
Part of the scrutiny on Netflix's content spend stems from the lack of clear metrics around the financial performance of streaming-first shows and movies.
Box office tallies for theater releases and TV ad revenue are tried-and-true metrics. With streaming-only platforms, viewership data varies from service to service and paints an incomplete picture for analysts trying to determine how a film or television show has actually performed.
A bill upwards of $200 million for a film like "The Gray Man" is harder to explain when there's no visible financial gain at the end of production, like studios see in box office ticket sales. Streaming subscribers pay flat monthly or annual fees to access all available content. Netflix argues its content keeps users on the platform and handing over subscriber fees.
For Netflix, the push into big-budget movies is a way to burnish its image and quiet criticisms that it churns out mediocre content. The company has shored up its balance sheet, is cash flow positive and has a three-year window before a significant portion of its debt matures, giving it some wiggle room to spend.
It's unclear how much Netflix spent per film for its "Fear Street" trilogy, and there's limited data around its performance on the platform. But Nielsen ratings estimated that "Fear Street 1994" generated 284 million viewing minutes during its first week on the service and "Fear Street 1978" tallied 229 million minutes. It is unclear how the third film, "Fear Street 1666" performed.
What's more, the fourth season of "Stranger Things" has become just the second Netflix series to cross 1 billion hours viewed within the first 28 days of availability. Of course, comparing Netflix's films to its television series is a bit like comparing apples to oranges, but it's the best data analysts have access to as long as the company keeps quiet about content spend and success.VIDEO1:5501:55Netflix has a monetization ~ not subscribers ~ issue, says Engine Media's Tom RogersSquawk Box
Many entertainment experts have tried to crunch the numbers on how streaming hours translate to revenue, retention and, ultimately, the strength of Netflix's business. But much of how Netflix decides what to greenlight and what to cancel remains a mystery to analysts.
Based on Netflix's own data, "The Gray Man" amassed more than 88 million hours in worldwide viewing during its opening weekend on the service, 60 million fewer hours than "Red Notice" pulled during the same period last November. "Red Notice" stayed in the top spot of Netflix's top 10 list for 12 days, while "The Gray Man" was usurped after just eight days.
As of Friday, the film holds the fourth spot on the list behind "Purple Hearts," "Tower Heist" and "Age of Adaline."
So, was "The Gray Man" worth its $200 million price tag? It appears to have have hit some behind-the-curtain metric for Netflix, which is moving forward with a sequel and a spinoff.
"Netflix, obviously has the data and the methodology that they believe is accurate, to determine what is this success at Netflix and what isn't," said Dan Rayburn, a media and streaming analyst. "If ['The Gray Man'] had bombed by their definition of bombing, whatever that is, we don't know, they would not have announced an expanded deal."
As for how Netflix makes its content choices, Rayburn says that while data is not currently widely available, that could change once the streamer enters the ad market.
"Whether they want to give us data or not, we're gonna get more data as the years go on, because the advertising side," he said. "That's gonna help us better understand content."
Disclosure: Comcast is the parent company of NBCUniversal and CNBC. Universal is the distributor of the Halloween franchise and "Get Out."TVWATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APPUP NEXT | ETListen