Aug 05, 2022
Little People’s Audrey Roloff shows off filthy home scattered with garbage, dirty dishes & food-stained highchair
This news has been received from: the-sun.com
All trademarks, copyrights, videos, photos and logos are owned by respective news sources. News stories, videos and live streams are from trusted sources.
mail: [NewsMag]
AUDREY Roloff is showing off more of her messy homelife.
This time, she's exposing her dirty living conditions and filthy floor.
5Audrey Roloff shows off her filthy house before date nightCredit: Instagram 5The reality star has been slammed in the past for her messy lifestyleCredit: Instagram/Audrey RoloffThe Little People, Big World star shared a photo to her Instagram Stories of her and husband Jeremy planning for a date night.
But the smiling couple had little room for dancing - or any other activity - due to a variety of items scattered on the floor.
The mess buried what appeared to be their dining room table, and even spilled onto baby Radley's high chair, which looked to be covered with the remains of meals gone by.
Audrey has had a history of being criticized for her conditions.
READ MORE AUDREY ROLOFFCAREFREE? Little People’s Audrey Roloff says Jeremy's ‘rarely concerned’ about the kidsBIG DISS LPBW's Audrey & Jeremy snub main family members in cruel moveJust a few weeks earlier, she was slammed for letting Radley, who will turn one in November, play in a dirty room that looked full of potential danger.
In an Instagram story, Audrey, 31, shared a video of her nine-month-old son jumping around in a baby bouncer attached to a wall frame in front of what appeared to be his nursery.
The tiny tot was all smiles as he twisted around non-stop.
Mom even captioned the video: "My jumping bean."
Most read in The US SunCODE RED China 'convinced it needs to hit US with Pearl Harbor-style strike' over TaiwanSLEEP ON IT Kim shares 'embarrassing' fact about Chicago, 4, that hints she 'misses' Kanye'SO TOXIC' Meghan McCain reveals cruel comment ex cohost said that made her quit The ViewDIET DANGERS The top 5 worst foods that could SHORTEN your life expectancyBut behind the bean, clearly visible, was a mess of sharp toys scattered on the floor, including a construction truck, books and papers and action figures.
Audrey made no excuse for the mess, defending it in a follow-up post.
"Y’all…this is nothing," she shared. "And in case you’re new around here, this is (and definitely won’t be in the coming months) your place for picture-perfect home content."
NURSERY NIGHTMAREEven before baby Radley's arrival, his nursery was a mess, as Audrey struggled to keep it clean.
Last October, just one month before his birth, Jeremy Roloff's wife gave fans a glimpse at her new baby’s nursery, which featured a crib, baby toys, a rocker and a neck pillow, all on the floor.
A pile of baby clothes was piled in the middle of the floor, while the room also includes what appears to be a suitcase ready for the upcoming delivery.
The reality star captioned the clip: “Baby number 3’s room.”
CAR CRASSAudrey's sloppiness seems to extend to her car as well.
In February, the mom-of-three showed off the interior of her automobile, which revealed trash and wires soaked in coffee.
Audrey uploaded a boomerang of the drink which had fallen on the vehicle's floor over a pile of wires and the kids' artwork.
She explained the mess with the caption: "When you forget you were resting it in the console."
Read More on The US SunKIMYE FOREVER? Kim and Kanye are 'working things out' amid rumors they're back togetherSILLY SAUSAGE Image of distant star posted by top scientist was actually a piece of CHORIZOThe next story showed her post had received a response from her husband Jeremy, which read: "Mad."
Sharing it with her followers, she responded with a sassy comeback and quipped: "Cares more about the truck than my caffeine necessities while on my own with the kids...", followed by an eye-roll emoji.
5Baby Radley, 9 months, jumps in front of his dirty room 5Audrey showed off the baby's messy nursery even before he was bornCredit: Instagram 5Even Audrey's car was slammed for its filthCredit: Audrey Roloff/InstagramNews Source: the-sun.com
Tags: little people big world instagram little people big world little people’s audrey roloff little people’s audrey people’s audrey roloff little people’s people’s audrey baby radley’s audrey roloff shows off audrey was slammed showed off audrey roloff captioned reality star in front even before even before baby radley
Anne Heches Ex-Husband Coleman Laffoon Is a Realtor
Next News:
Alex Jones’ $49.3M verdict and the future of misinformation
Alex Jones is facing a hefty price tag for his lies about the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre — $49.3 million in damages, and counting, for claiming the nation’s deadliest school shooting was a hoax — a punishing salvo in a fledgling war on harmful misinformation.
But what does this week’s verdict, the first of three Sandy Hook-related cases against Jones to be decided, mean for the larger misinformation ecosystem, a social media-fueled world of election denial, COVID-19 skepticism and other dubious claims that the Infowars conspiracy theorist helped build?
“I think a lot of people are thinking of this as sort of a blow against fake news, and it’s important to realize that libel law deals with a very particular kind of fake news,” said Eugene Volokh, a First Amendment professor at the UCLA School of Law.
U.S. courts have long held that defamatory statements — falsehoods damaging the reputation of a person or a business — aren’t protected as free speech, but lies about other subjects, like science, history or the government, are. For example, saying COVID-19 isn’t real is not defamatory, but spreading lies about a doctor treating coronavirus patients is.
That distinction is why Jones, who attacked the parents of Sandy Hook victims and claimed the 2012 shooting was staged with actors to increase gun control, is being forced to pay up while Holocaust deniers, flat-earthers and vaccine skeptics are free to post their theories without much fear of a multimillion-dollar court judgment.
“Alex Jones was attacking individuals,” said Stephen D. Solomon, a law professor and founding editor of New York University’s First Amendment Watch. “And that’s important. A lot of disinformation does not attack individuals.”
Lawyers for the plaintiffs, the parents of one of 20 first graders killed at the Connecticut school in 2012, said they hoped a big-money verdict against Jones would serve as a deterrent to him and others who peddle misinformation for profit.
“I am asking you to take the bullhorn away from Alex Jones and all of the others who believe they can profit off of fear and misinformation,” Wesley Ball said in his closing argument Friday. “The gold rush of fear and misinformation must end, and it must end today.”
Jones, who has since acknowledged that the shooting was real, has claimed his statements about Sandy Hook were protected by the First Amendment. He even showed up to court with “Save the 1st” scrawled on a piece of tape over his mouth.
But despite the public theatrics, Jones never got to make that argument in court. After Jones failed to comply with orders to hand over critical evidence, a judge entered a default judgment for the plaintiffs and skipped right to the punishment phase.
Jones’ lawyer Andino Reynal told the jury during closing arguments that a large judgment would have a chilling effect on people seeking to hold governments accountable.
“You’ve already sent a message. A message for the first time to a talk show host, to all talk show hosts, that their standard of care has to change,” Reynal told jurors.
Free speech experts say any chilling effect should be limited to people who wantonly disseminate false information, not journalists or other citizens making good-faith efforts to get at the truth of a matter.
“You have to look at this particular case and ask yourself, what exactly are you chilling?” Solomon said.
“The kind of speech that defames parents who have lost their children in a massacre is maybe the kind of speech you do want to deter. You do want to chill that speech,” Solomon said. “That’s the message that potentially the jury wanted to send here, that this is unacceptable in a civilized society.”
As for Jones, Reynal said he isn’t going away any time soon. He’ll remain on the air while they appeal the verdict, one of the largest and highest-profile decisions in a defamation case in recent years.
Among others: a gadfly ordered in February to pay $50 million to a South Carolina mayor after accusing her in emails of committing a crime and being unfit for office; a former tenant ordered in 2016 to pay $38.3 million for posting a website accusing a real estate investor of running a Ponzi scheme; and a New Hampshire mortgage provider ordered in 2017 to pay $274 million to three businessmen after he posted billboards accusing them of drug dealing and extortion.
“These kinds of damages and verdicts do have a chilling effect,” Volokh said. “They’re intended to have a chilling effect on lies that damage people’s reputations.”
___
Follow Michael Sisak on Twitter at twitter.com/mikesisak
___
Find AP’s full coverage of the Alex Jones trial at: https://apnews.com/hub/alex-jones
Copyright © 2022 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, written or redistributed.