This news has been received from:

All trademarks, copyrights, videos, photos and logos are owned by respective news sources. News stories, videos and live streams are from trusted sources.

mail: [NewsMag]

Getty Images Kevin Durant of the Brooklyn Nets talks with Stephen Curry of the Golden State Warriors.

After defeating the Boston Celtics in the 2022 NBA Finals, many people were not only ready to declare Golden State Warriors star Stephen Curry one of the greatest point guards of all time but perhaps one of the greatest players ever.

Former Brooklyn Nets guard Mike James is not in that number. During a recent appearance on “The Players Choice” podcast he omitted the four-time NBA champion from his top five point guard list. When asked about his omission, James cited his reason as Curry being “one dimensional”.

“Steph, how he plays and how he gets stuff off, it’s just kinda one-dimensional at times,” James said. “He’s not the primary ball-handler a lot, and for a point guard, that kinda bothers me,” James said.

The Warriors star apparently caught wind of James’ comments. While being interviewed at his upcoming basketball camp, one reporter asked Curry if he would have any mercy on the campers that chose to play him one on one. In his response, Curry hit back at James.

“It’s all bad for them, even as one-dimensional as I am,” Curry said sarcastically (H/T @WarriorsWorld on Twitter).

???????????????? #ThePettyKing

— warriorsworld (@warriorsworld) August 5, 2022

The latest Nets news straight to your inbox! Join the Heavy on Nets newsletter here!

Join Heavy on Nets!

Mike James Calls Curry ‘Murky’

Curry could retire today and likely still be a first-ballot Hall of Famer. Not only is he a four-time NBA champion and a Finals MVP winner. He is the first and only unanimous NBA regular-season MVP winner. 

If Curry continues at the rate he is going, he could end up one of the most decorated players in NBA history. Full stop. But still, James believes that Curry has been a beneficiary of the Warriors’ system, which is part of the reason he omitted him from his top-five point guard list.

“I think those other five can do whatever they want to do on any team in the world right now,” James added. 

“I just don’t know about that for Steph. It’s a little murky for Steph… If you put him in Minnesota, he would still kill, but I don’t know if it would be the same.”

Curry Details Why 2022 Title Is Different From Others

The Warriors faced a lot of turmoil en route to winning the 2022 NBA Finals. After losing to a younger, hungrier Grizzlies team in the 2021 play-in tournament, most people agreed that their time was officially over being among the NBA’s top competitors. 

Curry says that all the narratives that the Warriors were able to dispel on the way to the 2022 title is what makes it different from the other three.

“You go to these last two years and conversations, narratives, we’re ‘too old,’ the parallel timelines of developing young guys and keeping our core together, all those tough decisions that we had to make, that weighs on you for as much time as we’re going through it,” Curry said to Vincent Goodwill of “Yahoo Sports”.

“Then you get to the finish line, and that’s why I think this one is definitely different because of the three years of baggage we carried coming out of that Game 6 in 2019.”

After years of turmoil, the Warriors were able to get back to the mountaintop and reclaim the NBA title. It will be interesting to see if the Nets can do the same.

 READ NEXT: Kyrie Irving Sends Strong Message to U.S. Government After Brittney Griner Verdict

News Source:

Tags: golden state warriors nba steph curry breaking news 5 fast facts crime politics shopping don’t know golden state warriors one of the greatest one dimensional different stephen curry brooklyn nets warriors star the warriors team

Michigan AG Nessel Seeks Special Prosecutor in 2020 Election Probe

Next News:

Merrick Garlands case against Donald Trump is probably airtight | Opinion

First, the news. The FBI executed a search warrant on Monday morning of the former president’s home in Florida. Federal agents were looking for secret government documents that Donald Trump had taken with him after leaving the White House in January 2021.

The FBI’s search warrant arose from a grand jury investigation that was opened after representatives of the National Archives last January had gone to Mar-a-Lago to retrieve 15 boxes of documents.

That visit was followed by another visit “in the spring,” according to an unnamed Times source, this time by federal agents searching Trump’s residence for classified documents. “At least one of the agents,” the Times reported, “was involved in counterintelligence.”

READ MORE: Fox News parrots Donald Trump's FBI search talking points

So as far as we know, Monday’s was the third search.

But the first to be authorized by a federal judge.

Second, the legal context. The search warrant executed on Monday morning is separate from the J6 committee’s investigation of Trump’s leadership of the sacking and looting of the US Capitol in 2021 in a bid to take over the US government. It is separate from a criminal investigation in Georgia of election meddling. It is separate from a civil investigation in New York state of property-value fraud.

Third, the legal process. Federal search warrants are authorized by federal judges. To get approval, prosecutors must show probable cause – reasonable suspicion of a crime having been committed. They have to show evidence of there being more evidence of the crime at the place to be searched. All of this process is under oath.

READ MORE: 'Something went haywire': Ex-federal prosecutor breaks down one key element of FBI’s Mar-a-Lago raid

So the search is not a “preemptive coup,” because coups are illegal. This search was lawful. It’s not Watergate, because Watergate was a crime (burglary), as was its cover-up. This search was lawful. Federal authorities suspected reasonably that there were more documents at Mar-a-Lago. They apparently asked politely first. When that didn’t work, they presented the evidence they did have to a federal judge so that they could search the premises for more evidence of the crime.

At this point, we should pause to say that no one knows what the crime is, how many crimes there are or whether there are crimes at all. All we know is what’s been reported. Everything else is noise.

Speaking of which, fourth, the political backlash. Trump’s Republican allies say the search violates the tenets of American exceptionalism. We just don’t do that here, said US Senator Marco Rubio. “Using government power to persecute political opponents is something we have seen many times from 3rd world Marxist dictatorships.”

That might sound like a principled warning, but it’s garbage. No one ever said that American exceptionalism was cover for criming. Don’t let your love of country get in the way of your love of equal justice.

The president’s allies are also issuing threats. Without knowing anything more than that Trump’s gaudy residence was searched by lawful warrant, they are vowing to investigate US Attorney General Merrick Garland. Here’s House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy.

“The Department of Justice has reached an intolerable state of weaponized politicization,” he said last night. “When Republicans take back the House, we will conduct immediate oversight of this department, follow the facts and leave no stone unturned.”

Again, McCarthy hopes people see this as a principled position without noticing that there’s no probable cause. There’s no concrete reason to suspect a crime – unless McCarthy means that a lawful warrant is an unlawful act deserving of a congressional investigation.

And anyway, McCarthy is a material witness to the J6 insurrection who has thus far refused to cooperate with the J6 committee’s investigation. Remember that inconvenient fact when considering his allegation that the Department of Justice has been politicized. Even if it were, why would we tolerate hearing that allegation from a possible co-conspirator in the worst political crime in US history?

Rubio, too, issued threats. In doing so, he told us exactly who the Republicans are. If they have to break the law to hurt their enemies, that’s what they’ll do, he said in so many words. “Biden is playing with fire by using a document dispute to get the @TheJusticeDept to persecute a likely future election opponent,” Rubio said today. “Because one day what goes around is going to come around.”

In other words, Rubio is telling Biden – who had nothing to do with a federal judge authorizing a search warrant – that he should not do something that Rubio says is wrong or the GOP will do the same thing. But instead of being wrong, as he says it is now, it will be right.

That’s not a principled statement.

That’s a garbage statement.

That’s also the real issue.

The question isn’t whether the US will become a banana republic if a former president is prosecuted for committing crimes. You can still believe in American exceptionalism while believing that no one is above the law. In fact, if you believe in one, you believe in the other.

Anyway, we may be exceptional in the wrong way. People fear civil war if Trump is convicted, but lots of other democratic countries have convicted their former leaders without sinking into civil war.

The real question is how far the GOP will go to retaliate. Rubio and McCarthy have helpfully supplied the answer. They will investigate without cause. They will break the law. They might even defend a criminal president who led an attack on the seat of our government.

None of this is a defense of Merrick Garland or the Department of Justice. An attorney general can be political. See former AG Bill Barr. The FBI can be political. See former Director James Comey. Let’s not fool ourselves into believing the myth of political neutrality in justice.

But it’s because it’s political that we can have confidence in this new phase of the former president’s legal woes. I can’t – and I’m sure you can’t – imagine Merrick Garland signing off on this search, which he must have done given the demands of his recent policy memo, if he did not know that the case against Trump, whatever it is, is airtight.

Politics is making Garland exceptionally careful.

That’s the best way to honor American exceptionalism.

READ MORE: A 'nightmare scenario': Florida utility company used 'a shadowy nonprofit group' to back GOP Senate candidate

From Your Site Articles

    Other News

    • Eagles Camp Takeaways: Jalen Hurts Tracker, Backfield Surprise
    • Former Warriors Wing Sounds Off on Stephen Curry After Disrespect
    • Eddie Jones rapped over knuckles over his blast at England’s posh boys as RFU distance themselves from comments
    • Former Red Sox fan favorite heads to the dark side, but not the Yankees
    • Steph Curry & Ex-Warriors Champ Get Wild With Their Trophy [WATCH]
    • Has Kevin Durant situation become clearer for Heat . . . or even cloudier? Odds are, it remains confusing
    • North Carolina deputy alleges supervisor used excessive force. Deputy fired one day after filing report against his sergeant – its not a coincidence
    • How Pete Davidson REALLY feels about split from Kim Kardashian- and she won’t like it one bit
    • iPhone fans go wild for mind-blowing hack to locate handset that’s switched off
    • What is a scrum in rugby union?
    • Braves: Mets fans cant stop crying about Spencer Striders comments
    • New details leak about FBIs shock raid on Mar-a-Lago — and GOP leader fires back at AG Garland: Preserve your documents and clear your calendar
    • Crashes and Disasters | Dry lightning has sparked Californias most destructive fires. Scientists say it could happen more often
    • UFC star Paulo Costa fires controversial manager Wallid Ismail… and replaces him with stunning model girlfriend
    • I’m a 20-year-old mum and I’m sick of people saying the same things to me – they even ask if my baby was an accident
    • Why is Brittany so fired up?
    • Former Warriors Guard, NBA Champion Signs With Division Rival
    • Warriors Slammed for Letting Fan-Favorite Free Agents Walk
    • Haaland tipped to smash Premier League records after ONE GAME for Man City as team-mate Dias fires ominous warning