This news has been received from:

All trademarks, copyrights, videos, photos and logos are owned by respective news sources. News stories, videos and live streams are from trusted sources.

mail: [NewsMag]

A BAR employee has revealed how they deal with those who complain their drink is not strong enough.

With a sunny weekend ahead, some of us will be looking to go to a bar for a much-needed break and for a catch-up with their friends, or perhaps a first date.

3The bartender took it TikTok to share the industry secretCredit: TikTok/ soberbartender19 3The cocktail whizz revealed how he dealt with those complaining about their drinksCredit: TikTok/ soberbartender19

But as much as we love a boozy night-out - all within limits, of course - we'll also be familiar with how weak the alcoholic drinks sometimes taste.

Piles of ice, too much mixer and it feels as if you've just wasted £9 on a glass of juice.

This might be no surprise to bartenders - but according to one person working in the industry, they have a sneaky trick to deal with the unsatisfied customers.

The TikTok user @soberbartender19 took it to his social media page to reveal what really goes on behind the till.

read more food storiesPORKING HELL I'm a chef and you've been cooking your bacon all wrong

Sharing his knowledge with a younger staff member, the experienced bartender showed him what to do when someone is not happy with their cocktail.

''Teaching the rookie how to deal with ''it's not strong enough'','' read the text alongside the clip online.

Instead of pouring an extra shot like some would assume, the beverage whizz had a slightly different trick in mind - and it would for sure make you think the drink's stronger than before.

Holding a glass of a refreshing cocktail, he grabbed the black straw and carefully poured in a clear liquid straight from the bottle.

Most read in LifestyleTRUE BEAUTY I’m a fashion pro - I did a Victoria’s Secret haul, the pieces were stunningBREAST IDEA? My 34K boobs are so big they knock things over & cost me a fortune in brasWHAT THE QUACK I got 0.5mm of lip filler but regret it so much, I look like a duckBUZZ OFF I was tired of flies coming into my house, but I discovered a hack to repel them

Although he didn't explain in the video, this means that the person drinking from the straw will be hit with the amount of booze, immediately concluding that the cocktail is now stronger.

Continuing in the caption, the bartender recommended another, more simple alternative.

FABULOUS BINGO: Get a £20 bonus & 30 free spins when you spend £10 today

''Order a double.''

The video has gone viral, but perhaps for all the wrong reasons, as many had an issue with the man touching the straw.

''Don’t touch my straw,'' one demanded, to which another hit back: ''people saying “ew don’t touch the straw” have no idea what happens in the kitchen of restaurants.''

A fellow worker in the industry said: ''Someone told me I made the drink wrong. Demanded a new one.

''I took the exact same drink poured it into a new cup and she loved it.''

Read More on The SunHEAVEN OR HELL? I asked for a cute angel wings tattoo but was horrified by what I gotFAT SHAMED Docs said my huge legs were 'just fat' but a stranger spotted worrying symptoms

A customer shared their tactic: ''I always go to the bar with cash and and make sure my first two tips are huge.

''That way my drinks are stronger and I get immediate service.''

3Many viewers had an issue with the man touching the straw with his bare fingersCredit: TikTok/ soberbartender19

News Source:

Tags: food food hacks read not strong enough in the industry the bartender the bartender the cocktail the cocktail sneaky trick revealed how their drinks to deal their drink

Search For Person In Water Along Morrissey Boulevard In Dorchester Underway (DEVELOPING)

Next News:

Opinion | Walters: Housing factions use two California laws as weapons

As California ramps up pressure on local governments to increase housing production, two state laws are being employed by warring factions.

Down in the trenches of California’s seemingly perpetual clashes over housing, warring factions are employing two decades-old state laws as weapons.

One is the famous — or infamous — California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), signed by then-Gov. Ronald Reagan in 1970, that requires authorities to determine whether proposed developments have environmental impacts that must be mitigated.

The other, much less known, is the California Housing Accountability Act (HAA), signed by Reagan’s successor, Jerry Brown, in 1982 to prevent local governments from rejecting housing projects without good reason.

Those who oppose specific developments, particularly high-density apartments for low- and moderate-income families, often invoke CEQA, claiming they have negative impacts on the environments of their communities, such as increased traffic.

Construction unions also employ CEQA, threatening to use its provisions to delay or kill projects unless developers agree to use union labor.

In response, housing advocates, including project developers, invoke the HAA, accusing opponents of violating its pro-housing provisions, which have been strengthened in recent years, and filing lawsuits or complaining to the state housing agency.

The housing conflicts have been particularly sharp in San Francisco, whose left-of-center Democratic politicians are often starkly divided by housing issues. Last year, their incessant squabbling manifested itself in a confrontation over a 27-story, 495-unit apartment building proposed for a former department store parking lot.

After years of wrangling and modifications, the project at 469 Stevenson Street received CEQA clearance from the city’s planning commission, but San Francisco’s governing legislative body, the Board of Supervisors, voted 8-3 to overturn the commission action, agreeing with project opponents that it had potentially severe environmental impacts.

The state Department of Housing and Community Development took an immediate interest, opening an investigation and sending a letter to the city, saying the board’s rejection of the project for “various vague concerns” could put it in violation of the Housing Accountability Act.

The board’s reversal was particularly galling to San Francisco’s state legislators, who have been particularly aggressive advocates of pro-housing policies. “When San Francisco acts like this, it sends a very negative message to the rest of the region,” state Sen. Scott Wiener told the San Francisco Chronicle. “We have been pushing other cities to do their share, to be better, so when San Francisco does something like this, it puts the proverbial turd in the punch bowl.”

The dustup over 469 Stevenson had another impact. Assemblyman Phil Ting, a San Francisco Democrat, introduced legislation that, if enacted, would make it more difficult for opponents of projects to use CEQA and easier for proponents to invoke HAA.

The measure, Assembly Bill 2656, zipped through the Assembly on a strongly bipartisan vote and is awaiting action in the Senate. It also enjoys support from dozens of pro-housing organizations, while environmental groups and construction unions are opposed because it would make CEQA a less potent tool.

A Senate analysis of the bill frames its effect on the growing conflict between the two laws, saying it puts local governments between “a rock and a hard place” with “conflicting mandates to approve new housing under the HAA, but to simultaneously adequately account for the environmental impacts of housing under CEQA.”

That’s quite accurate, and it once again indicates that it’s high time for Gov. Gavin Newsom and the Legislature to comprehensively overhaul CEQA, whose original purpose of protecting natural resources has been distorted beyond recognition.

Former Gov. Jerry Brown once called CEQA reform “the Lord’s work,” but was never willing to undertake the heavy lifting it would require.

Dan Walters is a CalMatters columnist.

Related Articles
  • Opinion | Opinion: California’s secessionist movement — and its ties to slavery
  • Opinion | Opinion: Three major takeaways from the FBI search of Trump’s home
  • Opinion | Opinion: Military escalation in the Taiwan Strait would be perilous
  • Opinion | Krugman: Passage of climate bill offers hope for the world
  • Opinion | Opinion: Why moving in with your parents could be good for America

Other News

  • IRS Job Posting for Criminal Investigation Agent: Be Willing to Use Deadly Force, If Necessary
  • I’m a pro event planner – the best guests use these items under $15 that make them appear much classier
  • Bongino Derails Fox News Segment on Trump to Complain About Hillary, Hunter Biden
  • Longtime NJ Police Communication Officer Stole, Resold More Than $250K In Equipment: Prosecutor
  • Don’t let your sex life have a drought this summer – try these sexy hacks to get hot, not bothered
  • Kinzinger Admits Trump Won Their Feud: No Use in Pretending Somehow I Scored Some Major Victory
  • Even airline employees are having trouble finding a seat home from Europe this summer
  • Boil Water Advisory Issued For Parts Of Montgomery County Due To Water Main Break
  • Anthony Joshua’s new coach Robert Garcia can’t change his ‘WEAK mentality’ ahead of crunch rematch, says Usyk’s promoter
  • I’m a shopping pro – a simple price trick can save you cash at Target, and all you need is your phone
  • Tower of Fantasy: What do all the currencies mean?
  • Home and Garden | Gardening: Extend your cilantro harvest and enjoyment
  • Change Ad Consent Do not sell my data Petition: Tell Putin to Halt The Use of Marine Animals in Acts of War
  • ‘It was a close bond, very close’ – Chelsea boss Thomas Tuchel drops huge Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang transfer hint
  • Young women being ‘put at risk’ because NHS won’t talk about anal sex
  • How much sunscreen should I use?
  • You’ve been doing your eyeshadow all wrong – the right technique means it only takes seconds
  • Clothing subscriptions like Stitch Fix were once hot – but now might be the victims of ‘box fatigue’
  • I was wrongly accused of stealing from the Walmart self checkout – what to look for so you’re not caught out too