This news has been received from: CNN

All trademarks, copyrights, videos, photos and logos are owned by respective news sources. News stories, videos and live streams are from trusted sources.

mail: [NewsMag]

Washington (CNN)Shortly before the US withdrawal from Afghanistan, the Defense Department created a task force responsible for handling counterterrorism strikes inside the country after American troops had left -- a so-called "over the horizon" strategy that officials promised would keep Afghanistan from once again becoming a safe haven for terror groups like al Qaeda and ISIS to flourish.

More than a year after the creation of that task force, sources say it hasn't sent a single proposed target to the Pentagon for approval -- largely because without a presence on the ground, it hasn't been able to build enough intelligence on targets to meet the administration's standards for avoiding civilian casualties.The White House has hailed the CIA operation that killed al Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri in Kabul on Saturday as evidence that using over the horizon counterterrorism capabilities in Afghanistan has been effective. Current and former officials say the successful Zawahiri strike certainly proves that with the right intelligence, the US is perfectly capable of tackling a specific target from afar -- but those same sources also said that Zawahiri, a single, high-value target long in the CIA's crosshairs, was a special case that doesn't alone prove the effectiveness of the strategy.
    How Joe Biden and his team decided to kill the worlds most wanted terrorist"There's a difference between tracking one senior high value target and dealing with the resurgence of these terrorist groups inside Afghanistan," said Beth Sanner, a former presidential intelligence briefer under President Donald Trump and senior South Asia analyst at the CIA. "It's a just a whole different ball of wax."
      Some intelligence officials have publicly raised concerns that terrorist activity incubated in Afghanistan will spread outside the country's borders and pose a threat to the United States -- and that the US will be blind to it.Read MoreAsked directly by Sen. Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina, if he was worried about an attack on the homeland "emanating from places like Afghanistan," FBI Director Chris Wray on Thursday said, "We are. Especially now that we're out I'm worried about the potential loss of sources and collection over there.""I'm worried about the possibility that we will see al Qaeda reconstitute," he added.
        Hinting at how high the hurdles have become, some intelligence and military officials who were not involved in the closely-held planning details of the Zawahiri operation were pleasantly surprised that the US was still able to successfully carry out such a precision strike, according to a former intelligence official still in contact with former colleagues. Administration officials say that on the contrary, the Zawahiri strike is proof that the US is successfully monitoring and countering the threat without American boots on the ground in Afghanistan. Sources familiar with the intelligence behind the strike say the US integrated lots of different nuggets of data from multiple streams of intelligence to locate and target Zawahiri."I think I'm more satisfied and more confident [in US intelligence in Afghanistan] than I was even a week ago because of what that collection just enabled, which was a pretty remarkable, pretty precise action," a senior administration official told CNN on Friday.Al Qaeda needs a new leader after Zawahiris killing. Its bench is thinner than it once was."The fact that there haven't been other uses of force of that type in the past year means that we are monitoring and we are being judicious -- and where we think it reaches the point of needing to act, we're acting," the official said. "But I think it is a pretty powerful demonstration of what that capability can provide."The US now largely relies on drone flights and human networks on the ground to gather information about what is going on inside Afghanistan, according to a former intelligence official and the source familiar with the intelligence. But drone flights from the Gulf are logistically complicated and have limited loiter time in Afghanistan thanks to the long flight, making them expensive to use and limiting their usefulness. And without a US presence on the ground, intelligence professionals expect human networks may degrade over time. "I think we don't know what we don't know," one former official said. Difficult questionsFor now, there is broad consensus inside the intelligence community that the immediate threat that al Qaeda will be able to use Afghanistan as a safe haven to plan attacks on the US homeland or US interests remains low. But difficult questions remain about whether that risk will grow over time. Much depends on current unknowns -- in particular, how the Taliban responds to the killing of Zawahiri. "Will the Taliban actually let AQ use Afghanistan?" said one source familiar with the intelligence."There are a ton of factors that play into this debate," this person said. "And all complicated."The intelligence community in its annual threat assessment released this year rates the threat from al Qaeda affiliates in Yemen, Somalia and West Africa as a greater risk to US interests abroad than its weakened leadership in Afghanistan. Al Qaeda in Afghanistan, officials believe, is still gauging its ability to operate under Taliban rule and will likely remain focused on maintaining its safe haven rather than planning external operations -- at least for now. Bidens al Qaeda strike reveals an inconvenient truth about Americas war on terrorAnd although al Qaeda leaders have enjoyed "increased freedom of action" under the Taliban, according to a recent UN report, there has been no major influx of new fighters to Afghanistan since the US withdrawal — a reflection of how al Qaeda has evolved away from centrally-planned attacks, according to some analysts. But as for what happens next, one US source described the analysis across intelligence agencies as "all over the place.""What we don't think we have occurring is some sort of regrowth [or] regeneration of an al Qaeda operational presence — even with less famous names [than Zawahiri]," the senior administration official said.There is one school of thought that while some elements of the Taliban may feel honor-bound to uphold its oath to shield old guard members of al Qaeda like Zawahiri, it has no obligation or incentive to make welcome a new generation of fighters. And according to intelligence officials, there are vanishingly few members of the original al Qaeda leadership who remain in Afghanistan, none of whom are likely to replace Zawahiri. Meanwhile, the recent strike, some analysts argue, may dissuade terrorist leaders from traveling to the country from elsewhere. They argue that the far greater risk is al Qaeda affiliates in Africa and elsewhere that are only loosely connected to core leaders in Afghanistan. "There's some people who are very worried," said Sanner, who is now a contributor at CNN. "I personally think that AQ core in Afghanistan doesn't do a lot of operational planning."Others assess that it's more likely that the Taliban -- consumed with trying to legitimize its government amid a financial implosion and an ongoing conflict with ISIS-K -- simply may not have the bandwidth to prevent Afghanistan from being used by al Qaeda or its affiliates to plan attacks on the United States. There are also concerns that the remnants of al Qaeda may simply be absorbed into the Taliban. The UN report found a "close relationship" between al Qaeda and the Taliban. How the Taliban respondHow the Taliban responds to the death of Zawahiri remains an open question -- and one that intelligence and military officials are watching closely, multiple officials said. According to one source familiar with the intelligence, it's not clear to US intelligence how many people in the Taliban knew that Zawahiri was holed up in Kabul in a house owned by the powerful Haqqani faction -- a militant group that is part of the Taliban government. The Taliban has publicly denied that they were aware of his presence prior to the strike and analysts are closely watching to see if his exposure ushers in any kind of rift between the Taliban and the Haqqani. "The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan has no information about Ayman al-Zawahiri's arrival and stay in Kabul," a statement by the Taliban said.Images show Kabul house where al Qaeda chief was killed by US strikeWhite House officials said on Monday that senior Haqqani Taliban figures were aware of Zawahiri's presence in the area and even took steps to conceal his presence after Saturday's successful strike, restricting access to the safe house and rapidly relocating members of his family, including his daughter and her children."As far as we know, many people in the Taliban didn't know the Haqqani were sheltering Zawahiri in Kabul. "Does that create a split between the Taliban and the Haqqani?" the source familiar with the intelligence said.The senior administration official said Friday that the Taliban "is scrambling a bit to figure out who knew what and who didn't -- and moreover, to get their story straight on what happened."
          Some US military officials are hopeful, meanwhile, that the strike may help push the Taliban towards some sort of limited cooperation with the US to target ISIS-K, a common enemy and separate terrorist group in Afghanistan that the US military is far more concerned about than al Qaeda, according to two sources familiar with the dynamic. "I think this was a symbolic strike that removed an inspirational leader," Sanner said. "It completes the task of removing the two people who were at the center of 9/11. But it is the end of an era -- it is not about a current threat."

          News Source: CNN

          Tags: intelligence and military officials i’m worried ’m worried we don’t know the intelligence community what we don’t the intelligence community sources familiar don’t know to plan attacks intelligence officials it hasn’t military officials familiar inside afghanistan the us withdrawal some intelligence information some intelligence the united states ayman al zawahiri al qaeda leaders that the taliban afghanistan over the horizon zawahiri strike terrorist group concerned al qaeda leader use afghanistan former official how the taliban us intelligence in afghanistan officials said monitoring human networks the taliban some analysts drone flights were aware concerns officials say

          Zardes hat trick leads Rapids over Minnesota United 4-3

          Next News:

          DC insider: Deleted Jan. 6 texts are ‘very clearly a conspiracy’

          While President Barack Obama gave the executive order for the operation that resulted in Osama bin Laden’s death in Pakistan on May 11, 2011, it was under President Joe Biden’s watch that another top al-Qaeda leader, Ayman al-Zawahiri, was killed in Kabul, Afghanistan on July 31, 2022. Afghanistan is now under the control of the far-right Taliban, but al-Zawahiri’s death sends out a message that even in a Taliban-controlled country, a leader al-Qaeda terrorist can’t hide from U.S. forces.

          Leon Panetta, who served as director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and later, secretary of defense under Obama, discussed al-Zawahiri’s death during an August 3 appearance on MSNBC — whose Andrea Mitchell noted now how “astonishing” it was that “as far as we know, they were no civilian deaths” even though the operation was carried out in the middle of Downtown Kabul. And Mitchell also brought up the January 6 committee’s investigation and the disappearance of Secret Service texts.

          Panetta, now 84, said of al-Zawahiri’s death, “I pay tremendous tribute to our intelligence forces, our military forces that were involved, the CIA…. There’s a tremendous amount of planning involved in those kind of attacks. The ability to do constantly reconnaissance, to gather intelligence, to know that you have the right target, to be able to hit that target without any kind of collateral damage, I think, is a tribute to their capabilities. And in the end, I do think it completes a very important mission that we began on 9/11, which was to make sure we would go after those who were involved in the attack on 9/11…. It really does send a message that you don’t attack the United States and get away with it.”

          READ MORE: Secret Service scrambling to explain deleted Jan. 6 texts to 'skeptical' House committee members: report

          Panetta, who also served as White House Chief of Staff under President Bill Clinton, noted that bin Laden and al-Zawahiri were the “key planners” of the al-Qaeda terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 — and now, both of them have been killed by U.S. forces.

          Mitchell asked Panetta, however, if he was worried that terrorists — after learning that al-Zawahiri was in Kabul at the time of his death — might consider Afghanistan a “safe haven” because the Taliban “have clearly not lived up to their agreement not to harbor terrorists after the U.S. withdrawal.”

          Panetta told Mitchell, “The Taliban is now in charge of Afghanistan; there’s no question that they’re providing a safe haven for terrorists…. The fact that al-Zawahiri, one of the top leaders of al-Qaeda, could simply walk into Kabul, get an apartment in the middle of the capitol, not have anybody raise any questions sends a real signal that the Taliban is going to continue to provide a safe haven for terrorism.”

          The former CIA director went on to say that terrorism has “metastasized in many ways.”

          READ MORE: 'Coverup of treason': Trump-appointed IG, facing investigation, was aware of missing Secret Service and DHS texts far earlier

          Panetta told Mitchell, “It’s ISIS, it’s Boko Haram, it’s al-Shabab in North Africa, and it continues to be al-Qaeda. So, we are facing, and continue to face, a real threat of a terrorist attack either on the United States or elsewhere. That’s one of the major flashpoints that we have to control.”

          Mitchell brought up another form of violent extremism: White nationalist violence in the United States, asking Panetta to weigh on the disappearance of U.S. Secret Service texts from January 6, 2021. And he responded, “Andrea, this is another major concern: that, obviously, officials out of the Trump Administration were taking steps to make sure that potential evidence involved in January 6 would not be there. I really do think that the Justice Department has to investigate the loss of this kind of critical evidence…. This was a deliberate effort to make sure that very important evidence regarding what the players were doing at the Pentagon, at the Secret Service and elsewhere were saying and doing on January 6 — all of which is very relevant to the investigation into what happened.”

          When Mitchell asked Panetta, “You’re saying this is a cover-up?” he responded, “I don’t think there’s any question that when you go from agency to agency and find out that key messages have been deleted, something’s going on here that resembles very clearly a conspiracy.”

          Watch the video below or at this link.

          Jan. 6-related Texts Wiped 'From Agency To Agency' Looks Like 'Conspiracy': Panetta

          READ MORE: Republicans largely ignore Biden killing of top terrorist — as some even use it to attack the president

          From Your Site Articles

            Other News

            • DC insider: Deleted Jan. 6 texts are ‘very clearly a conspiracy’
            • Vladimir Putin is not afraid to use nukes & he could launch strike very soon, warns top British general