This news has been received from:

All trademarks, copyrights, videos, photos and logos are owned by respective news sources. News stories, videos and live streams are from trusted sources.

mail: [NewsMag]

Democratic Arizona Sens. Kyrsten Sinema and Mark Kelly have joined a bipartisan legislative effort that would set up a reserve Border Patrol and give agents a 14 per cent raise.

The lawmakers are pushing the effort along with Republican Sens. Rob Portman and James Lankford to boost the agency, which has come under pressure by the surge of border crossings.

'Border Patrol must maintain a strong workforce to secure the border, protect our communities, and ensure the fair and humane treatment of migrants. Border Patrol does not have the staffing or resources to meet that goal – our bipartisan legislation addresses these issues to adequately support Border Patrol as they protect Arizona communities,' Sinema said in a statement Thursday.

According to sponsors, the legislation would increase the total number of U.S. Border Patrol agents to 20,500, with a newly created 2,500 reserve force.

Arizona Democratic Sen. Mark Kelly joined a bipartisan effort to boost pay of US Border Patrol agents

The pay boost, which is well above inflation, would make salaries 'competitive' with other Department of Homeland Security agencies, while standardizing training. 

The agency has sometimes come under fire amid fierce partisan fights over immigration.

Last month U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) published the findings of its Professional Responsibility's investigation following the alleged 'horse whipping' incident in Del Rio, Texas, which produced a national uproar.

Also signing on was Sen. Kyrsten Sinema, who said she would move 'forward' with the Democratic Inflation Reduction Act

The effort is cosponsored by Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.) and Sen. Rob Portman (R-Ohio)

The measure establishes a reserve Border Patrol and boosts pay for agents

Last month U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) published the findings of its Professional Responsibility's investigation following the alleged 'horse whipping' incident in Del Rio, Texas, which produced a national uproar. It found 'no evidence that agents struck any person with horse reins'

 It found there 'were failures at multiple levels of the agency, a lack of appropriate policies and training, and unprofessional and dangerous behavior by several individual Agents,' but found 'no evidence that agents struck any person with horse reins.'

The bipartisan announcement came on a day when Sinema announced she would move 'forward' with her party on reconcilation legislation, where Democrats needs support of all 50 of their members.

It also comes as Kelly, who is up for reelection, announced that he pressed DHS to complete a section of border wall at the Yuma sector, the Washington Examiner reported. 

He said he was glad DHS 'is going to close these gaps.'  

Lankford ripped President Biden in his quotation in the joint bipartisan statement and accused him of encouraging illegal crossings.

'Biden continues to encourage illegal border crossers to enter the US, and our Border Patrol stand between US citizens and people from 150 countries coming into our nation, potentially connected to the Mexican cartels or terrorist organizations worldwide,' he said. 'I've heard from Border Patrol directly that morale is low because their hands are tied when trying to enforce the law, which makes it difficult to recruit and retain the best and brightest. We must ensure the Border Patrol has the people and tools they need to do their job and the incentives to bring in the best people. Our national security depends on it,' he said. 

News Source:

Tags: topics index responsibility’s investigation investigation following ’forward’ customs and border protection ’no evidence investigation incident he said border patrol agents last month u kyrsten sinema border protect in the best rob portman

Diamondbacks and Rockies meet to decide series winner

Next News:

Vladimir Putin is not afraid to use nukes & he could launch strike very soon, warns top British general

VLADIMIR Putin is not afraid to use nukes - and could resort to such a strike as soon as next spring, a top British general has warned.

Sir Richard Barrons warned the Russian tyrant is "likely" to use tactical nuclear weapons if he faces being driven back in Ukraine.

3Vladimir Putin is feared to be ready to use nukes in UkraineCredit: AFP 3Russian missiles - such as the Iskander - are capable of carrying 'tactical' nukesCredit: AFP

The decorated commander - who retired in 2016 - explained that the Russians doctrine accepts the use of small nuclear weapons as a means of "coercion".

"It would be the first use of nuclear weapons for 77 years, breaking an enormous taboo, but this is not inconceivable to Russians if the ends justify it in their eyes," he wrote in The Sunday Times.

Sir Richard warned the West needs to consider the fact Putin is now "likely to employ tactical nuclear weapons" if he faces being pushed back in Ukraine.

And with Ukraine expected to begin a new offensive to try and drive out the Russians, the leading general said Russia could put nukes on the table as soon as the early months of 2023.

READ MORE VLADIMIR PUTINNUCLEAR FEARS Russia risks disaster by firing missiles from Europe's largest nuclear plantVLADIM-EAR 'Sickly' Putin using body double with different EARS, claims Ukraine

Sir Richard wrote: "A broader Ukrainian offensive and mobilisation expected as soon as next spring could lead to battlefield successes and the liberation of land seized by Russia.

"This might create other risks.

"If Putin senses defeat, will he be tempted to use tactical nuclear weapons to change reality on the battlefield?"

He explained that a Russian nuclear strike in Ukraine would not be using massive city-killing bombs which could completely level parts of London or New York.

Most read in US NewsBRING IN THE CLOWNS Inside fest where clown-faced horror rap fans playfight with sex toysGUN HORROR Detroit mass shooting leaves one dead and at least four woundedSAVED BY FLIPPER Hero dolphins RESCUE Brit swimmer from 6ft shark lining up attackHUNTING KILLER JonBenét Ramsey murder suspects narrowed down as investigators get key leads

Russian doctrine instead demands smaller weapons for such battlefield use - possibly less powerful than the nukes dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki by the Americans to end World War 2.

Even the comparably "small" size of these weapons - the Fat Man and Little Boy - killed more than 200,000 people and wrought unspeakable horrors on the two cities.

Sir Richard suggested a situation where a 10kt warhead could be detonated by the Russians - potentially delivered by an Iskander missile.

"These weapons exist for just the sort of circumstances the war in Ukraine may lead to, so nobody should claim total surprise if they are used," he said.

The general suggested the use of a nuclear weapon in Ukraine could be a breaking point for the West - potentially leading to a wider intervention and an effort to remove Putin.

And he warned of the wider consequences of the nuclear taboo being shattered after three quarters of a century, with nations such as China, India and Pakistan all nuclear armed and often teetering on a knife edge of geopolitical tensions.

Ukraine meanwhile is facing a "long, bitter winter" as the war rolls on.

Kyiv has boasted it hopes to recruit a one million-strong army to drive the Russians back - but all these soldiers have to be equipped and supplied should the offensive be successful.

If Putin senses defeat, will he be tempted to use tactical nuclear weapons to change reality on the battlefield?

Sir Richard Barrons

Putin had hoped his war would be over in a matter of days, with it suggested he could potentially launch a blitzkrieg assault to seize Kyiv.

But this never happened - and some 164 days on the war continues to be a bloody, brutal and grinding conflict laced with unspeakable atrocities committed by the Russians.

And with every day, week and month that sleeps by, the looming shadow of nuclear war is cast long over Ukraine.

Russia is thought to have around 2,000 nuclear weapons in their arsenal in the form of small yield missiles, torpedoes and artillery shells.

Moscow's war doctrine is believed to be open to using nuclear weapons in a conventional conflict as an intimidation tactic - and use of such a weapon must be signed off personally by Putin.

The tactic became known as "escalate to de-escalate".

Moscow has previously practiced such strategies in the field - such as simulating a Nato attack on the Russian enclave of Kaliningrad.

The scenario saw the Russian forces strike back at the invading West by firing nuclear arms at Poland and the US.

3Sir Richard Barrons issued the dire warning over PutinCredit: Estonian Defence Forces

And these drills are believed to have taken place in the nineties and noughties, with tactical nukes used for both offense and defense.

The weapons lack the truly terrifying devastating destructive power of the biggest Cold War-era weapons - such as the Tsar Bomba.

A single 58 megaton Tsar Bomba could cause devastation across 50 miles area, kill millions of people, send a shockwave that would circle the globe three times, and cause a mushroom cloud visible for 500 miles.

Such a bomb was deemed far too big to ever be used due to the potentially apocalyptic consequences of such a nuclear exchange.

But that sort of thinking is what has pushed war planners to develop and potentially use tactical - as opposed to strategic - nuclear weapons.

Earlier this year, Dr Patricia Lewis, an expert from the Chatham House think tank, told BBC News: "They might not see it as crossing this big nuclear threshold.

"They could see it as part of their conventional forces."

And meanwhile, General James R. Clapper Jr. a retired US Air Force commander, warned Moscow has lowered its bar for using atomic weapons.

He told the New York Times that Russia regards nuclear arms as "utilitarian rather than unthinkable".

Read More on The SunAISLE SAY! 'Tacky' bride slammed over wedding sign- can YOU spot what's got people talking?

And elsewhere in Ukraine, there is the ongoing fear of a nuclear accident as Russia was accused of shelling the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power station.

Western nations continue to support Kyiv in its fight against Putin with weapons and aid - but the ongoing conflict has plunged the world into tensions not seen since the Cold War.

Other News

  • Arizona attorney general race to have big impact on abortion rules, election claims
  • I’m an interiors expert and these are the five mistakes you are making that are making your home look cheap
  • Dems push Biden climate, health priorities toward Senate OK
  • I thought Prince Andrew was going to prison & Fergie didn’t have a penny – they owed me MILLIONS, says socialite
  • Vladimir Putin is not afraid to use nukes & he could launch strike very soon, warns top British general
  • Decathlon Kiprun GPS 500 by Coros review: Essentials at low prices