This news has been received from: CNN

All trademarks, copyrights, videos, photos and logos are owned by respective news sources. News stories, videos and live streams are from trusted sources.

mail: [NewsMag]

(CNN)The Biden administration this week announced two new steps aimed at placing more Americans into high-quality jobs, dedicating $500 million toward workforce training and unveiling a new toolkit focused on helping employers hire and retain qualified workers.

First, the Department of Commerce this week announced 32 awardees of the Good Jobs Challenge -- distributing out a half billion dollars in funding from the American Rescue Plan to workforce training partnerships that the administration estimates will place 50,000 American workers into quality jobs.
And now, Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo and Labor Secretary Marty Walsh are launching the Job Quality Toolkit, a document shared with CNN that's aimed at guiding small- to medium-sized employers on strategies to attract and retain their workforce.
    "We have an unemployment rate that's very low in this country. And what we need to start to focus more on is the quality of jobs, which is good for employers and good for Americans," Raimondo told CNN. "We have far, far too many Americans who work full time and live in poverty. That's not good for our country or communities or our economy."
      The administration's new efforts came ahead of Friday's latest jobs report, which showed that the US economy added 528,000 jobs in July, according to data released Friday by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. That 3.5% unemployment number far surpasses economists' expectations and matches a previous 50-year low record. Read MoreAfter consulting with approximately 60 job quality experts, the Department of Commerce developed the toolkit with strategies for employers that go beyond fair wages, with broad recommendations that call on workplaces to adopt practices that assess and prioritize workplace flexibility, safety, equity, diversity, professional development and overall well-being. The recommendations direct employees to benefits as basic as a 401(k) retirement plan. But they also go a step further tackling a range of issues, like encouraging workers to discuss burnout and suggesting employers make efforts in the on-boarding process to understand a new hire's pronouns. Additionally, a section on employee unionization suggests employers support workers' rights to collective bargaining and organizing, also recommending employers inform workers of their right to form a union and remain neutral during organizing activity.
        The Covid-19 pandemic has transformed the way Americans work, spurring new types of business opportunities, pushing many workers to do their jobs remotely and motivating many employees to reevaluate whether their career path was the best fit. Adapting to those changes hasn't come without challenges. Record numbers of Americans have been resigning from their jobs. Employees have been pushed to unionize over their concerns about their health, safety and wages during the pandemic at companies like Amazon and Starbucks. The health care industry is experiencing rates of resignations and burnout so high that the US surgeon general has raised the alarm. Spurred by these consequential shifts in the labor market earlier this year, Walsh launched the Good Jobs Initiative -- a broad framework led by the Labor Department that's aimed at informing workers of their rights and engaging employers to help them retain workers. The toolkit and the challenge grants are part of the initiative. "What the pandemic taught us is that the workplace and companies have experienced a lot of challenges over the last few years," Walsh said in an interview with CNN. "Some businesses were on the verge of going out. Some workers want don't want to work 9 to 5 anymore. And the toolkit helps us provide strengths to those businesses that can be sustainable moving forward, long term."Walsh emphasized that while a successful jobs report is one marker for the economy, he's also focused on ensuring that the jobs being filled are setting up workers and employers for sustainable development. "We really have to figure out how we (can) make sure that people ... are working on a pathway to a good job, that they're not just working on a pathway to getting by or just taking a job for the sake of taking it," the labor secretary said. At a roundtable on Thursday at the Department of Commerce to launch the new toolkit, representatives for nonprofits, businesses, unions and other stakeholder groups discussed how the new document will be deployed across the businesses and industries within their coalitions.
          The toolkit is also expected to be implemented through the DOC's Manufacturing Extension Partnership Program, which consults with small and medium sized manufacturers across the country. The toolkit will become part of their regular operations when they discuss talent retention with manufacturers. At Thursday's event -- which had a long list of participants that included the Small Business Roundtable, the Asian American Chamber of Commerce, Reimagine Main Street and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers -- Raimondo said she'd like the group to reconvene in six months.

          News Source: CNN

          Tags: that’s aimed aimed biden administration this week announced workforce training the administration the administration workers of their labor secretary for employers the good jobs the pandemic medium sized employees part jobs report that the us

          Brooklyn Beckham and Nicola Peltz kiss on red carpet amid family drama

          Next News:

          Bidens IRA Takes Aim at a Tactic for Amassing Corporate Wealth and Avoiding Taxes. Will It Work?

          Mother Jones illustration; Getty

          Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

          The Inflation Reduction Act—the blockbuster tax and climate reform bill passed by the Senate earlier this week—includes several provisions aimed at forcing corporations to pay a fairer share of their taxes. These include a rule requiring large corporations to pay a minimum of 15 percent of their profits in taxes, $80 billion in additional funding for the IRS to ramp up tax enforcement, and an extension of the 2017 tax bill’s limits on the use of business losses to shrink tax bills.

          But there’s another change worth diving deeper into. If passed, the IRA will impose a 1 percent tax on stock buybacks, a tactic used by corporations to increase their stock price. Buybacks continue to grow in popularity: In 2022, corporate America is projected to spend a record $1 trillion on them. They’ve long caused consternation among Democrats, who accuse corporate executives of using buybacks to avoid taxes and to enrich themselves instead of better compensating their employees: a “sugar high for corporations” and a “tax scam to reward CEOs while laying off workers,” in the words of Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren.

          To understand why Warren and other Democrats have targeted buybacks, it’s helpful to first dig into how they work, and why corporations love them. A buyback is when companies purchase shares of their own company from investors, driving up the value of the remaining stock because there are fewer shares circulating. Buybacks are taxed at the lower capital gains rate, which maxes out at 20 percent for the wealthiest households. But for those investors who don’t sell their shares back to the company, there’s no tax—even though the value of their holdings has increased. Until that investor sells the asset, their wealth will grow tax-free. And thanks in part to a tax code loophole that enables the wealthy to pass shares on to their heirs, who can then skip paying capital gains taxes on them altogether, buybacks play a role in building untaxed generational wealth.

          Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) has called buybacks a “sugar high for corporations” and a “tax scam to reward CEOs while laying off workers.”

          This tax dodge is at the root of what has made buybacks so popular. Illegal until the early 1980s, buybacks have skyrocketed in the last five years thanks to the Trump administration’s 2017 tax bill. The law heavily reduced corporate taxation, so many companies started investing their extra tax savings into buybacks—enriching their top executives and their investors, often at the expense of their workers. A report from the Brookings Institute in the spring found that 16 major American corporations that employ millions of frontline workers spent $49 billion on buybacks during the pandemic, and less than half of that to increase worker wages. The companies “could have raised the annual pay of their median workers by an average of 40% if they had redirected the stock buybacks from the last four quarters to workers,” wrote the authors of the report.

          That’s what drove Sens. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) to propose this buyback tax. “Instead of spending billions buying back stocks and handing out CEO bonuses, it’s past time Wall Street paid its fair share and reinvested more of that capital into the workers and communities who make those profits possible,” Brown said in a statement when first proposing the tax.

          Once the IRA is signed into law—it’s expected to pass the House as soon as Friday—companies will have to shave 1 percent off buybacks to send to Uncle Sam. But to what extent will this tax help the majority of Americans? Will it shrink the advantages that have made them a favored tactic of wealthy executives and investors, and who will see the benefits of that change?

          The answer is complicated, but two impacts of this change are important to note. The 1 percent tax will raise about $73 billion in tax revenue for the federal government over the next decade—more than five times the revenue that would have been raised from closing private equity’s favorite tax loophole (a provision cut from the final bill), and a third of the $223 billion that is projected to be raised from the 15 percent minimum tax on corporations. That is a lot of dough from just 1 percent. Aside from raising revenue, the buyback tax will mitigate the advantage for top executives, company founders, and foreign investors, while also encouraging big companies to reinvest in their workers to boost jobs and pay. And going from no tax to some tax is a meaningful first step toward more robust taxation in the future, says Daniel Hemel, a professor of tax law at New York University’s law school and the co-author of a 2021 paper about the benefits of imposing a tax on buybacks.

          The 1 percent tax will raise about $73 billion in tax revenue over the next decade—more than five times the revenue that would have been raised from closing private equity’s favorite tax loophole.

          Confronted with the prospect of additional taxes, companies may issue fewer or smaller buybacks to compensate for the extra money they must send to the government, essentially passing the cost of the tax to their investors. And faced with smaller buybacks, firms that manage millions of dollars in investments and own enormous chunks of stock in major companies may start to favor buybacks less over dividends, which have fewer tax advantages.

          “CEOs are basically taking orders from Blackrock, Vanguard, State Street, Fidelity, because those companies own a ton of stock in every publicly traded corporation,” Hemel says. “So hopefully, BlackRock and Vanguard really do pull the strings.”

          Meanwhile, there are several other longstanding issues that Democrats hope a buyback tax will help counteract. The first is the use of buybacks to juice CEO pay while shrinking corporate taxes. Thanks to legislation passed in the ’90s, companies can compensate their top executives with stock and then deduct its value from their end-of-year tax bill. That means corporations have used buybacks to drive up their share prices and later boost their executives’ pay—and then deduct the grand total from the company’s taxes.

          Then there’s what Hemel and his co-author Gregg Polsky, a professor at University of Georgia’s law school, have deemed the “Panama Papers problem.” Foreigners who stash their wealth in offshore havens like Switzerland or the Cayman Islands often invest that offshore money in the US market. If their shares get dividends, they must pay an even higher tax rate on those than Americans—up to 30 percent. But capital gains are taxed by the country where the funds are located—meaning that, in the case of buybacks on investments stored offshore, they simply won’t get taxed at all. By creating a tax to make buybacks less attractive to corporations, Congress is mitigating a popular gambit for foreign tax dodgers. And potentially also raising some serious cash: Hemel and Polsky calculate that if the buyback tax were to rise to 2.5 percent, it would raise about $27 billion from foreign investors in tax havens.

          Finally, Hemel and Polsky’s “Mark Zuckerberg problem” points to yet another tax advantage of buybacks. Named after the Facebook CEO, it refers to founders who get early equity in their startups. Those stakes grow to enormous valuations, which can be even further juiced through buybacks. If those founders hold on to those shares and pass them on after death, that next generation can cash them out without paying any taxes, thanks to the aforementioned tax loophole for heirs.

          A 1 percent buyback tax certainly won’t make all of these advantages disappear. But it will mitigate them, and it will kick off an incremental approach that has worked in the past to reform tax policies. The first federal income tax in 1863, Hemel points out, was just 2 percent, and was then built up over the last century into the robust income tax system used today.

          “Part of what made the 1 percent excise tax on buybacks possible was that it was only 1 percent,” he says. “But part of what makes the 1 percent tax attractive to progressives is the fact that it can become something other than 1 percent.”

          Other News

          • More than half of US employers plan to offer abortion travel benefits by next year: Poll
          • Gov. Doug Ducey Issues Executive Order to Fill Gaps in Southern Border Wall
          • I made more than $100 in profit after 30 minutes at Goodwill – easy steps to turn your shopping into a side hustle
          • OSHA investigates deaths of Amazon workers in New Jersey
          • Arizona starts filling border wall gaps with shipping containers. State no longer waiting on the federal gov’t
          • Technology | Rare Apple-1 computer up for auction could have been the one from historic moment
          • Line 3 Replacement Project is just what Clearbook needed to thrive
          • Peloton announces 784 job cuts, $500 price hikes on equipment and a mandatory return-to-office policy amid massive loss of share prices
          • Environment | Californias top environmental official leaving to run $3.5 billion climate change project funded by Laurene Powell Jobs
          • Peloton is cutting jobs, closing stores and hiking prices
          • Best Buy cuts hundreds of store jobs as sales soften, according to report
          • WATCH: Carolina Panthers Fans Are Moments Away From Brawl Before Wide Receiver D.J. Moore Steps In To Deescalate
          • Peloton shares jump as company announces price hikes for some products
          • Surprise WR Steps Up to Lead Giants in Preseason Win vs. Patriots
          • Johnson & Johnson announces end to talcum powder globally
          • Biden administration has engaged directly with Syrian government to try to bring Austin Tice home
          • Job unhappiness is at a staggering all-time high, according to Gallup
          • Kelly Ripa reveals major career move with husband Mark Consuelos and son Michael as she steps away from Live
          • Change Ad Consent Do not sell my data Someone Abandoned This Baby Gecko on a Doorstep