This news has been received from: CNN

All trademarks, copyrights, videos, photos and logos are owned by respective news sources. News stories, videos and live streams are from trusted sources.

mail: [NewsMag]

(CNN)The Atlanta grand jury investigating former President Donald Trump's 2020 election reversal plots will run into legislative privilege issues if it asks subpoenaed Georgia lawmakers about communication with other legislative members or their staff, a state court judge said Friday.

But the judge signaled he'd likely greenlight certain questions about the lawmakers' third-party communications.
Fulton Superior Court Judge Robert C. I. McBurney was hearing a motion put forward by members of Georgia's legislature seeking to quash a subpoena in the grand jury's investigation.
    During a hearing on the motion, McBurney said he wanted to offer general guidelines for what kinds of testimony would be protected by legislative privilege or immunity. The judge did not issue a formal ruling laying out that guidance, but said he would do so soon, as some of the subpoenas are for appearances requested in mid-July.
      "If the grand jury is investigating alleged criminal actions by third parties -- not the witnesses -- then if their exploration leads to questions of a legislator or her staff members about communications with people outside that legislative sphere that are related to the investigation, I believe those are not protected by legislative immunity," McBurney said at the hearing.Read MoreThe subpoena fight emerges from the investigation Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis has launched into former President Donald Trump's election subversion gambits in Georgia. A state Senate hearing that GOP Georgia legislators organized in December 2020, at which Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani pushed false claims of mass election fraud, has become a focus of the investigation.
        Already, at least four witnesses -- three of them Democratic state lawmakers -- have testified about the hearing in front of the special purpose grand jury that has been convened for Willis' investigation. Two Republicans signed on to request with the court that it quash subpoenas for their grand jury testimony in a Monday court filing that argued that both legislative immunity and legislative privilege shielded their testimony. Specifically, they asked the court to declare out of bounds any testimony about "matters that occurred in the witness' legislative" testimony about members' "motivations" in their legislative activity and any testimony concerning "research" done by the legislator, "including interviewing constituents, lobbyists, or other sources of information" as they relate to the legislative process. The motion was put forward by former state Sen. William Ligon, Lt. Gov. Geoff Duncan, "and others," and the Republicans sought to shield "any" General Assembly member from testifying about those topics. At the hearing Friday, their attorney Don Samuels -- who is acting in the capacity of special assistant legislative counsel -- said other members of the legislature were interested getting guidance from the court about what testimony is protected by privilege. In a response filed with the court on Thursday, the district attorney's office pointed to the subject matter of the hearing in question. Referring to a recommendation listed in a report issued by legislators calling for the "rectifying" of the 2020 election results, Willis' office said in the filing: "The General Assembly cannot, either in 2020 or today, 'rectify' election results by changing the outcome of a certified election that had already taken place, and it is never, and can never be, considered a legitimate 'legislative duty' to attempt to do so." "Holding hearings and generating a report and generating report intended to propose 'rescinding' and election certification is entirely outside of the General Assembly's jurisdiction," Willis' court filing said. "Additionally, presenting demonstrable falsehoods a 'findings' in a committee report should never be considered conduct protected by legislative immunity or privilege, and to suggest otherwise makes a mockery of the 'integrity of the legislative process' the movants supposedly seek to preserve by shielding themselves from legitimate inquiry from Georgia citizens."
          The judge signaled Friday he didn't find that argument persuasive. The bulk of the hearing focused on what kinds of testimony the grand jury could seek from legislators and their staff about their communications with third parties. Samuels argued testimony that got into the content of those conversations would violate constitutional protections for lawmakers because that testimony would touch on a lawmaker's motivation for taking legislative action. The judge declared testimony about a lawmaker's motivations among the broad buckets protected by legislative immunity and privilege.McBurney did not give a clear indication how much he would restrict questions about the substance of those conversations. But he suggested that grand jury questions about who the lawmakers spoke to as they prepared for the December 2020 hearing would be permissible. The judge said he believed the grand jury was "entitled" to ask questions about which third parties lawmakers spoke to so that it could then bring those third parties in for questioning.

          News Source: CNN

          Tags: former president donald trump’s president donald trump’s donald trump’s a lawmaker’s the general assembly the general assembly communications questions atlanta grand jury lawmakers spoke the investigation election results testimony the grand jury put forward and generating at the hearing the hearing with the court third parties the lawmakers any testimony court filing a legislator their staff court judge

          Search For Person In Water Along Morrissey Boulevard In Dorchester Underway (DEVELOPING)

          Next News:

          Lawyer In Whitmer Kidnap Plot Trial Raises Concern About Juror

          (AP) — A judge overseeing the second trial of two men accused of conspiring to kidnap Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer took steps Friday to keep a lid on a defense lawyer’s concerns about whether a juror will be fair.

          U.S. District Judge Robert Jonker said any subsequent court filings about the issue will be sealed from the public and attorneys can’t talk publicly about it.

          READ MORE: Here's A List Of Construction In Metro Detroit This Weekend

          Adam Fox, who lived in the Grand Rapids, Michigan, area, and Barry Croft Jr., who is from Bear, Delaware, are charged with planning to abduct the Democratic governor to ignite a national revolt in 2020. The trial began Tuesday after a different jury in April couldn’t reach a unanimous verdict. Two other men were acquitted.

          FILE – This photo combo of images provided by the Kent County Sheriff and Delaware Department of Justice, respectively, shows Adam Dean Fox, left, and Barry Croft Jr. on April 8, 2022. The men who are accused of crafting a plan to kidnap Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer in 2020 and ignite a national rebellion are facing a second trial with jury selection starting Tuesday, Aug. 9, 2022, months after a jury couldn’t reach a verdict on the pair while acquitting two others in the case. (Kent County Sheriff and Delaware Department of Justice via AP, File)

          Croft’s attorney, Joshua Blanchard, claimed a juror had hoped to be selected for the trial and would ensure a certain verdict, according to a court document obtained by The Detroit News before it was sealed Friday in the online file.

          READ MORE: Man Recovers From Injuries In Non-Fatal Shooting, Detroit Police Continue Searching For Suspect

          Blanchard said in the filing that his source had “apparent credible identifying information regarding the juror which lent credibility to the assertions.” He requested a hearing to investigate the matter.

          In his order, the judge acknowledged the issue and disclosed that he twice met privately with lawyers. He said Blanchard’s filing doesn’t “accurately and completely” include available information.

          “For now, the court expects to continue addressing the situation in non-public hearings and filings while the case is pending to limit the risk of mistrial,” Jonker said.

          Testimony resumed Friday in Grand Rapids with no changes in the jury box.

          MORE NEWS: Michigan, Consumers Energy Pledge To Power More Than 1,200 Government Buildings With Clean Energy

          © 2022 Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

          Other News

          • Oakland Athletics | Tuckers grand slam helps Astros rally past As
          • Two Democratic Lawmakers Cast 10 Proxy Votes Each on House Floor in Favor of $740 Billion Spending Bill
          • Biden could EASE pressure on Iran to rescue the nuclear deal Trump killed despite Rushdie attack and assassination plots on US soil, leaked negotiations reveal
          • Bill to decriminalize psychedelics in California gutted by lawmakers
          • BREAKING NEWS: Serena Williams is given a blockbuster draw against US Open champion and British teen sensation Emma Raducanu in first round of Western & Southern Open in Cincinnati... as 23-time Grand Slam champion edges ever closer to retirement
          • Julia Haart loses abuse case against estranged husband
          • Trump besieged on all sides: An FBI raid, a New York tax probe, a Georgia grand jury on stolen elections and his CFO in court for tax fraud
          • ALL THEY HAD TO DO WAS ASK Trump Bitches on Truth Social They Didnt Need to Seize Documents He Said He Didnt Have
          • Crime and Public Safety | Judge approves murder charge in case where Oakland driver ran over shovel-wielding assailant, defense calls it an accident
          • Worried about being greedy? Here are 3 questions to ask before trimming a winner
          • Metro Detroit Man Charged With Murder In Death Of Grand Blanc Teen
          • Two House Democrats Ask Their Voters to Support Liz Cheney in Primary
          • California Politics | Decision day: Which bills did California lawmakers kill?
          • Horowitz: How is this DOJ witch hunt against congressional conservatives not unconstitutional?
          • Driver Was Going Double Speed Limit In Fatal Head-On Crash: Somerset Prosecutor
          • ASK IRA: Could Heat, Riley see crimson with NBAs clover?
          • Floyd Mayweather charging £1,200 for online meet-and-greets amid claims that boxing legend is running out of money
          • Advice | Ask Amy: My husbands parents have a cruel surprise planned for their will
          • Advice | Harriette Cole: It was a big deal that I posted these photos. My boyfriend said nothing.