Jun 30, 2022
Wisconsins conservative high court hands GOP another weapon
This news has been received from: wtop.com
All trademarks, copyrights, videos, photos and logos are owned by respective news sources. News stories, videos and live streams are from trusted sources.
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Wisconsin’s conservative-controlled Supreme Court handed Republicans their newest weapon to weaken any Democratic governors in the battleground state, ruling this week that political appointees don’t have to leave their posts until the Senate confirms their successor.
The court’s decision — in the case of a conservative who refused to step down from an environmental policy board for more than a year after his term expired — marks another loss for Democratic Gov.Tony Evers as he faces reelection in November. Republicans have worked to reduce Evers’ powers since even before he took office and have refused to confirm many of his appointees. This week’s ruling gives them the ability to block them simply by declining to hold a nomination vote.
“Most people on the street would say when a term … expires, there’s an opening. The Supreme Court has said that commonsense understanding is not right,” University of Wisconsin-Madison political science professor Barry Burden said. The ruling “raises the question of why is there a term at all? Maybe we just say a person serves for life the way a U.S. Supreme Court justice does.”
Republicans are likely to control the Legislature for years to come largely due to gerrymandered districts.
After Evers was elected in 2018 but before he took office, they passed laws during a lame-duck session that temporarily stripped him of his power to appoint members of the state’s economic development agency and gave legislators the ability to block executive branch agencies’ rules and policies.
So far, the Senate has refused to confirm about 42% of Evers’ 299 appointees, according to Evers’ office. What’s more, the Senate took the rare step in 2019 of voting not to confirm Evers’ agriculture secretary, Brad Pfaff, after Pfaff criticized GOP lawmakers for not providing enough money to help farmers with mental health problems. Pfaff had to step down.
The struggle over appointments took a turn in the spring of 2021 when Fred Prehn’s term on the Department of Natural Resources policy board ended. Evers appointed his successor, a move that would have given his appointees a one-member majority on the board and his administration the power to shape environmental policy.
Prehn, who was appointed by former Republican Gov. Scott Walker, refused to step down. He has since cast the deciding vote to increase the quota for the state’s wolf hunt and to scrap limits in well water on a group of chemicals known as PFAS, an abbreviation for perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substance,
Democratic Attorney General Josh Kaul sued to force Prehn off the board. The state Supreme Court’s four-justice conservative majority ruled Wednesday that a vacancy must exist before a governor can fill it — and that a “vacancy” occurs only if the incumbent dies, resigns or is removed for misconduct.
The decision essentially prevents a governor from replacing the previous governor’s appointees without Senate confirmation.
The ruling left Democrats stunned.
“Today, I remind the Wisconsin Supreme Court and the Republican Party of this state that we do still live in a democracy, a very basic function of which is the peaceful and respectful transfer of power, even — and most especially — when you lose,” Evers said. “(His appointees) should be considered on their merit, and should have the opportunity to serve the people of our state, regardless of whether or not they were appointed by a Democrat or share the same ideas as Republicans in the Legislature.”
Kaul called the decision another symptom of the breakdown of democracy.
“What this (ruling) is doing is allowing the Legislature to not represent the people of Wisconsin, to expand its authority and control an executive branch agency,” Kaul said.
Adam Gibbs, a spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Devin LeMahieu, didn’t respond to messages.
Prehn isn’t the only Republican appointee who has refused to leave. The 13-member Wisconsin Technical College Board has three members whose terms ended in May 2021.
Nicholas Fleisher, president of the Wisconsin chapter of the American Association of University Professors, said the Prehn decision also adds another layer of politics to University of Wisconsin System Board of Regents, 16 of whom are appointed by the governor to seven-year terms. She said it could hurt the board’s credibility nationwide.
“Like so much else in our (government) systems, there are certain norms, decorum and shame involved in making these systems work,” he said. “Those things are obviously out the window.”
Follow Todd Richmond on Twitter at https://twitter.com/trichmond1
Copyright © 2022 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, written or redistributed.
News Source: wtop.com
Tags: university of wisconsin the state’s environmental policy executive branch the legislature has refused democratic gov supreme court the people the wisconsin policy board the decision appointed the decision
12-team College Football Playoff would offer clarity amid chaotic parity
The chaotic College Football Playoff picture in 2022 would have been perfect for the expanded 12-team field coming in a couple of years.
The four-team College Football Playoff hasn’t been the perfect solution for crowing a national champion, but the Top 4 has been more straightforward than not with conference champions claiming the top spots.
So it’s funny that days after a 12-team College Football Playoff got the go-ahead, the worst-case scenario for a four-team field came to life.
USC lost to three-loss Utah in the Pac-12 Championship Game, then TCU lost to three-loss Kansas State in the Big 12 Championship Game. What could have been a simple field with four conference champs, will now include at least two non-conference champions. The debate about who those should be is now on.
The members of the CFP selection committee have to be looking around right now and asking if we couldn’t switch to a 12-team field this year.A 12-team College Football Playoff would have solved problems in 2022
*Assuming conference title game victories
If the CFP was expanded to 12 for this season, half of the debates could be settled on the field. Conference champions would be rewarded with a bye week, making those games meaningful again. And losing a conference title game would have weight, with USC and TCU losing the advantage of a bye week.
Ohio State and Alabama would both get the chance to prove they belong in the playoff by beating the teams in front of them in the playoff. And if they were to lose, they wouldn’t do so while denying other worthy teams a spot.
There would also be room for dark horse teams like Clemson, Tennesee, Penn State and Tulane to have their say.
It’s just a shame that the perfect scenario for a 12-team field has come two years too early. It’ll arrive in 2024.Next: 3 CFB programs who should fire their head coach, but wont
For more College Football news, analysis, opinion and unique coverage by FanSided, including Heisman Trophy and College Football Playoff rankings, be sure to bookmark these pages.