Apr 15, 2021
H.R. 40 reparations bill advanced by House panel, seeking to further effort of repaying descendants of slaves
This news has been received from: abc7.com
All trademarks, copyrights, videos, photos and logos are owned by respective news sources. News stories, videos and live streams are from trusted sources.
WASHINGTON -- A House panel advanced a decades-long effort to pay reparations to the descendants of slaves by approving legislation Wednesday that would create a commission to study the issue.
It's the first time the House Judiciary Committee has acted on the legislation. Still, prospects for final passage remain poor in such a closely divided Congress.
The legislation would establish a commission to examine slavery and discrimination in the United States from 1619 to the present. The commission would then recommend ways to educate Americans about its findings and appropriate remedies, including how the government would offer a formal apology and what form of compensation should be awarded.
The bill, commonly referred to as H.R. 40, was first introduced by Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich., in 1989. The 40 refers to the failed government effort to provide 40 acres (16 hectares) of land to newly freed slaves as the Civil War drew to a close.
"This legislation is long overdue," said Rep. Jerrold Nadler, the Democratic chairman of the committee. "H.R. 40 is intended to begin a national conversation about how to confront the brutal mistreatment of African Americans during chattel slavery, Jim Crow segregation and the enduring structural racism that remains endemic to our society today."
The momentum supporters have been able to generate for the bill this Congress follows the biggest reckoning on racism in a generation in the wake of George Floyd's death while in police custody.
Still, the House bill has no Republicans among its 176 co-sponsors and would need 60 votes in the evenly divided Senate, 50-50, to overcome a filibuster. Republicans on the Judiciary Committee were unanimous in voting against the measure.
RELATED: Evanston city council approves reparations housing program
Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio, the ranking Republican on the committee, said the commission's makeup would lead to a foregone conclusion in support of reparations.
"Spend $20 million for a commission that's already decided to take money from people who were never involved in the evil of slavery and give it to people who were never subject to the evil of slavery. That's what Democrats on the Judiciary Committee are doing," Jordan said.
Supporters said the bill is not about a check, but about developing a structured response to historical and ongoing wrongs.
"I ask my friends on the other side of the aisle, do not ignore the pain, the history and the reasonableness of this commission," said the bill's sponsor, Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, D-Texas.
Other Republicans on the committee also spoke against the bill, including Rep. Burgess Owens, an African American lawmaker from Utah, who said he grew up in the Deep South where "we believe in commanding respect, not digging or asking for it." The former professional football player noted that in the 1970s, Black men often weren't allowed to play quarterback or, as he put it, other "thinking positions."
"Forty years later, we're now electing a president of the United States, a black man. Vice president of the United States, a black woman. And we say there's no progress?" Owens said. "Those who say there's no progress are those who do not want progress."
But Democrats said the country's history is replete with government-sponsored actions that have discriminated against African Americans well after slavery ended. Rep. David Cicilline, D-R.I., noted that the Federal Housing Administration at one time refused to insure mortgages in Black neighborhoods while some states prevented Black veterans of World War II from participating in the benefits of the GI Bill.
RELATED: Evanston reparations program approved as city becomes 1st in US to do so; some say it's not enough
EMBED More News Videos
Evanston resident Donna Walker is the perfect candidate for Evanston's Restorative Housing Program for Black residents, but she's not going to apply.
"This notion of, like, I wasn't a slave owner. I've got nothing to do with it misses the point," Cicilline said. "It's about our country's responsibility, to remedy this wrong and to respond to it in a thoughtful way. And this commission is our opportunity to do that."
Last month, the Chicago suburb of Evanston, Illinois, became the first U.S. city to make reparations available to its Black residents for past discrimination and the lingering effects of slavery. The money will come from the sale of recreational marijuana and qualifying households would receive $25,000 for home repairs, down payments on property, and interest or late penalties on property in the city.
Other communities and organizations considering reparations range from the state of California to cities like Amherst, Massachusetts; Providence, Rhode Island; Asheville, North Carolina; and Iowa City, Iowa; religious denominations like the Episcopal Church; and prominent colleges like Georgetown University in Washington.
Polling has found long-standing resistance in the U.S. to reparations to descendants of slaves, divided along racial lines. Only 29% of Americans voiced support for paying cash reparations, according to an Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research poll taken in the fall of 2019. Most Black Americans favored reparations, 74%, compared with 15% of white Americans.
President Joe Biden captured the Democratic presidential nomination and ultimately the White House with the strong support of Black voters. The White House has said he supports the idea of studying reparations for the descendants of slaves. But it's unclear how aggressively he would push for passage of the bill amid other pressing priorities.
Members of the Congressional Black Caucus brought up the bill during a meeting with Biden at the White House on Tuesday.
"We're very comfortable with where President Biden is on H.R. 40," Jackson Lee told reporters after the meeting.
The video in the player above is from an earlier report.
News Source: abc7.com
Tags: slavery society slavery house of representatives u s world race in america president of the united states say there’s no no progress say there’s there’s no republicans african americans on the committee a commission the white house this commission the white house black residents the legislation the legislation the democratic reparations the commission the commission said the bill jackson lee slavery house panel the measure against on property
Metro Council Considers Bill That Prohibits License Plate Scanner Use for Enforcement of Tennessee Abortion Laws
Nashville Metro Council is proceeding with legislation prohibiting the use of license plate scanner (LPR) technology to aid in the enforcement of “laws outlawing abortion or outlawing interstate travel to obtain an abortion as an allowed use of LPRs.”
On Tuesday, August 16, Metro Council will consider BL2022-1385, a bill on second reading that is an “ordinance amending Section 13.08.080 of the Metropolitan Code of Laws pertaining to the use of license plate scanner technology to exclude assisting with enforcing laws outlawing abortion or outlawing interstate travel to obtain an abortion as an allowed use of LPRs.”
The legislation is sponsored by councilmembers Bob Mendes, Colby Sledge, Brett Withers, Freddie O’Connell, Gloria Hausser, Nancy VanReece, Sandra Sepulveda, Emily Benedict, and Ginny Welsch.
The bill says in part, “WHEREAS, on June 24, 2022, the Supreme Court of the United States announced its decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, No. 19-1392, 142 S.Ct. 2228, a landmark decision in which the court held that the Constitution of the United States does not confer any right to abortion, overruling nearly 50 years of legal precedent established under Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey.”
It then affirms Nashville Metro Council’s support for abortion.
“WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council supports the right to abortion access previously established under Roe v. Wade and finds that restrictions upon reproductive rights and private healthcare decisions threaten the safety and well-being of the residents of Nashville and Davidson County, particularly for women unable to travel to neighboring jurisdictions where abortion care is safe and legal,” says part of the legislation.
It additionally notes that Section 13.08.080 of the Metropolitan Code of Laws, which provides for the current LPR law does not mention use of the technology for assisting with any enforcement of laws that prohibit or restrict abortion.
The bill goes on to say the following:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT OF NASHVILLE AND DAVIDSON COUNTY:
Section 1. That G(1)(a)(ii) of Section 13.08.080 of the Metropolitan Code of Laws is hereby amended by adding a new subpart at the end of the part as follows:
( ) the enforcement of any law prohibiting, limiting, or criminalizing reproductive healthcare, including an abortion, or prohibiting, limiting, or criminalizing interstate travel for the purpose of obtaining reproductive healthcare, including an abortion.
Section 2. Be it further enacted that this ordinance take effect immediately after its passage, the welfare of The Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County requiring it.
Council staff added a note in the bill analysis that says, “This ordinance amends Metropolitan Code of Laws Section 13.08.080.G(1)(a)(ii) to add a new subsection prohibiting the use of license plate scanner technology for assisting with enforcing laws outlawing abortion or outlawing interstate travel to obtain an abortion. The Metropolitan Code of Laws has provisions governing what LPR may be used for and prohibited uses for LPR. This ordinance would add ‘the enforcement of any laws prohibiting, limiting, or criminalizing reproductive healthcare, including an abortion, or prohibiting, limiting, or criminalizing interstate travel for the purpose of obtaining reproductive healthcare, including an abortion’ to the prohibited uses of LPR.”
– – –
Aaron Gulbransen is a reporter at The Tennessee Star and The Star News Network. Email tips to [email protected]. Follow Aaron on GETTR, Twitter, Truth Social, and Parler.
Photo “Automated License Plate Reader Surveillance Cameras” by Tony Webster. CC BY 2.0.