This news has been received from: marketwatch.com

All trademarks, copyrights, videos, photos and logos are owned by respective news sources. News stories, videos and live streams are from trusted sources.

mail: [NewsMag]

A group of Kansas and Missouri hair salon and restaurant owners can proceed with a lawsuit trying to make their insurance company pay for the income they missed out on during COVID-19 government shutdown orders, a judge ruled Wednesday.

The businesses adequately alleged — for now at least — that they ought to be covered by their “all-risk” insurance policies, Western District of Missouri Judge Stephen Bough ruled after combing through insurance policy wording.

The ruling could have broad implications as more businesses sue their insurance carriers for denying similar claims, observers say.

Business interruption insurance replaces lost income when a business has to temporarily close its doors. The policies kick in when there’s “direct physical loss or damage.” That typically applies to events including burst pipes, fires or damage from a nasty storm.

So does it kick in when businesses close their doors under government orders to slow the spread of an invisible, communicable virus? And does it apply when many policies might contain coverage exclusions related to fallout from a virus?

In the first few decisions on business interruption coverage amid the pandemic, three judges have sided with carriers and dismissed the cases.

Bough’s decision marks the first time a judge has decided to let businesses go ahead with their case.

The Cincinnati Insurance Company’s policies covered “physical loss” or “physical damage,” the businesses emphasized in court papers.

“ ‘COVID-19 allegedly attached to and deprived Plaintiffs of their property, making it ‘unsafe and unusable, resulting in direct physical loss to the premises and property.’ ’ ”

— Western District of Missouri Judge Stephen Bough

But Bough noted the carrier didn’t define “physical loss,” so he had to make his own interpretation.

“COVID-19 allegedly attached to and deprived Plaintiffs of their property, making it ‘unsafe and unusable, resulting in direct physical loss to the premises and property,’” the judge wrote.

These policies had no exclusion for economic fallout from viruses, he noted.

The salons and restaurants, including cafes and an Italian restaurant, followed a range of city and state shutdown orders from Kansas and Missouri that stretched from March to May, according to court papers.

The seven businesses that filed the lawsuit only passed an initial hurdle and the case is not over, Bough noted. But one attorney said it’s an important first step.

“It’s a huge decision for policyholders to use as persuasive authority in other cases,” said Kim Winter, a partner at Lathrop GPM, where she represents policyholders in coverage disputes.

Though Winter doesn’t represent a side in this lawsuit, she’s negotiating the same sort of coverage question for other business clients. At least 1,000 lawsuits have been filed related to insurance coverage amid the pandemic, she estimated.

The cases sometimes hinge on dry questions like policy language, but the stakes can be high in these lawsuits, Winter said. “It could be the difference between businesses going out of business if there’s no insurance money,” Winter said.

It’s a serious matter for the insurance industry too. One industry expert told federal lawmakers in May that carriers can’t and shouldn’t pay these claims for a range of reasons.

“Given this unpredictability and really unimaginable potential for loss, insurance is simply unable to underwrite or cover a pandemic like COVID-19. This concept is expressly clear in standard business interruption policies,” according to Sean Kevelighan, CEO of the Insurance Information Institute, an industry-funded consumer education association.

Re-writing a contract like an insurance policy is “unconstitutional” and retroactive business interruption payouts “would bankrupt insurance,” he told members of the House of Representatives’ Small Business Committee.

One-third of small businesses have a business interruption policies, according to Kevelighan.

Brandon Boulware, one of the lawyers representing the Kansas and Missouri businesses, called Bough’s ruling “a significant win…and an important first step in compelling Cincinnati Insurance to stand by its policy and pay covered losses. The Cincinnati policy is an ‘all risks’ policy and does not contain any exclusion for losses caused by a virus. The Court’s Order recognizes that. We look forward to moving ahead with this case.”

In a brief decision issued the same day — which cites the decision on the salon and restaurant case — Judge Bough let the business entity that wholly or partially owns at least four bar and grill establishments go ahead with a separate case against Cincinnati Insurance.

Cincinnati Insurance Company CINF, -1.76% told MarketWatch it would ultimately prevail.

“We respect the legal process. As this case continues, we believe that the court will ultimately enforce the language of our policy contract. Our commercial property insurance policies require direct physical damage or loss to property and do not provide coverage in this case,” a spokeswoman said.

While these insurance cases and others wend through the court system, federal lawmakers are focused on a different legal question — how much liability protection businesses and schools should have against lawsuits alleging coronavirus exposure.

Republicans want to include a “liability shield” any new stimulus bill, but Democrats oppose the idea.

The proposed shield would toughen legal standards to win in court. Opponents said it’s not necessary because there is no wave of personal injury cases related to COVID-19, but proponents say businesses need the protections before they get sued, not afterwards.

News Source: marketwatch.com

Tags: corrections

Top vet names the five VERY surprising dog breeds she would NEVER own and those she loves the most

Next News:

Brit mum-of-four killed in ‘shooting accident’ after relative was ‘cleaning weapon’

A BRIT teacher has been killed after being accidentally shot by a relative who was cleaning a gun, it was reported.

Fatima Issa, a mum-of-four from Leicester, was visiting family in South Africa with her husband when the tragedy happened.

2Fatima Issa was killed in a freak accident in South AfricaCredit: Facebook/Fatima Issa 2Fatima pictured with her husbandCredit: Yusuf Abramjee / Twitter

The news was revealed by local anti-crime advocate Yusuf Abramjee and reported by The South African newspaper.

“A woman from Leicester in the UK has died of a gunshot at a house in Meyersdal View Estate, outside JHB,” he tweeted.

“A family member was apparently cleaning a firearm. Fatima Lambat Issa was on holiday.

“She is pictured here with her husband, Fayaz, during happier times in Cape Town.”

The City of Leicester College paid tribute to her on their Twitter account.

“Everyone at The City of Leicester College is deeply shocked and saddened to hear about the tragic passing of our colleague and friend Fatima Issa.

“We all wish her family courage and peace during this time.”

Other News

  • Kourtney Kardashian covers up her stomach wearing a swimsuit during boat ride with Penelope, 10, amid pregnancy rumors
  • Jersey Shore Suspect Fatally Stabbed Man During Fight: Prosecutor
  • Detroit Man Injures Neighbors Dog After Firing Shots Into Home During Dispute
  • Man Injures Neighbors Dog After Firing Shots Into Home During Dispute
  • Black Woman’s Brain Shifted in Her Skull During Fatal Arrest, Expert Says
  • 4 Nabbed After Crashing Stolen Car During High-Speed Police Chase In Morris County
  • New York Times blasted for negative presidential coverage
  • 25 million children missed out on lifesaving vaccines in 2021, WHO and UNICEF data shows
  • UK justice secretary plans to bar biological males from womens prisons: Its obvious a woman cannot be born with a penis
  • Mystery of judge found dead at bottom of lake after he disappeared during family getaway
  • Expanded health insurance subsidies remain intact for 13 million people under Inflation Reduction Act
  • Senate Democrats adopted Dont test, dont tell COVID policy to rush through inflation bill: You can bring your ventilator and still vote
  • Federal report calls out Illinois for not reporting unemployment fraud
  • Several People Injured After Tree Falls During West Philadelphia High School Reunion Party At Fairmount Park
  • Charlamagne Accuses Biden of Targeting African Americans With New Push to Bust PPP Loan Scammers: He Loves Locking Black People Up
  • John Oliver Goes After His New Parent Company as Mass Layoffs Loom: Youre Burning Down My Network for the Insurance Money
  • These 30 companies will help employees pay off their student loans
  • Hospital Marketing Director's 38 Firearms, Loaded Mag Uncovered During Bomb Threat Hoax: PD
  • Bernie Sanders crafts amendment to close holes in Medicare that are harming seniors